Welcome to my first Q and A session! For those of you that are new to my blog, I will be posting a Q and A article on every Tuesday. Throughout the week, ask me questions via twitter (@FranjiPensPress) using #FranjiPensPress or comment your question on a Facebook (Franjione Pens Press) post. I will answer every question that I get, so feel free to ask away! As for the first week of Q and A, let’s get underway:
Alex Light: What are your thoughts on the new lines that just came out? Sprong on the 3rd line is just a little bit off in my opinion. Also, what do you think about the fact that Johnston is “experimenting” with some of the line changes?
Brad Franjione: There are a ton of elements that I love about the line changes Johnston made. At the same time, there are elements I am not a huge fan of. For those of you that are unsure about what the Penguins line combinations were as of this past Saturday against the Predators, here they are:
Dupuis – Crosby – Hornqvist
Plotnikov – Malkin – Kessel
Kunitz – Bonino – Sprong
Perron – Cullen – Rust
First of all, I love love LOVE the fact that Johnston finally put Kessel with Malkin, and put Hornqvist back with Crosby. Last year, Crosby and Hornqvist really developed some awesome chemistry. I also think that Hornqvist’s playing style of getting to the front of the net encourages Crosby to shoot more and gives him more space to work.
Kessel with Malkin is going to work. I promise you this. Malkin plays such a dominant game, and loves possessing the puck in the offensive zone. This draws defensemen in towards Malkin, and gives players like Kessel more space to find the soft spots in the defense to look for opportunities.
I said it once, and I’ll say it again: James Neal was a 40 goal scorer with the Penguins, and he played with Malkin, not Crosby.
As of now, I am not a huge fan of Plotnikov on the 2nd line, but both Perron and Kunitz failed to succeed in a top 2 line role, so I guess Plotnikov is getting a second crack at it.
Finally, let’s talk about Sprong. I would love to see him on the first or second line, BUT he is a natural right winger, and with the likes of Hornqvist and Kessel, it is highly unlikely that Sprong plays over either of these 2 guys. The only way he plays in the top 6 if they convert him to be a left wing, which I do not think they will do.
So for now, I do not mind Sprong on the 3rd line…
He should see way more than 8 minutes of ice time per game, which is about what he is getting. He is one of the Penguins’ most skilled offensive forwards, and the Penguins are lacking in the goal scoring department.
2 + 2 = 4 right? Then let Sprong do what he does best: score goals.
As for the last part of your question, I understand why Johnston wants to experiment with the line combinations, because clearly something needs to jump start this offense. That being said, experimenting with line combinations is something that should be done in the preseason. Johnston pretty much kept Kunitz, Crosby, and Kessel together and kept Plotnikov, Malkin, and Hornqvist together.
That’s your time to “experiment”, not now. But line changes needed to be made, and I’m glad he at least did that.
Josh Godwin: Will Bruce Boudreau coach for the Pens at some point this year?
Brad Franjione: First, let me fill everyone in on the situation. Bruce Boudreau is currently the coach for the Anaheim Ducks. During the preseason, the Ducks were seen as one of the Stanley Cup favorites. All of that being said, the Ducks are 1-5-1 to start the season, with only 6 goals scored in those 7 games.
Boudreau is probably on the hot seat, and if the Ducks continue on this downward slide, Boudreau could very easily be unemployed soon.
As we all know, the Penguins are struggling to find offense, and Mike Johnston is definitely on the hot seat here in Pittsburgh.
If both Boudreau and Johnston get fired (theoretically), I would think that there is a chance the Penguins take a look at Boudreau. However, this would only be a realistic situation if Boudreau was fired before Johnston, and the Penguins were able to get in contact with Boudreau and initiated talks with him about coaching in Pittsburgh.
I would give a higher probability to see either Tocchet or Jacques Martin behind the bench if Johnston is let go. But there is absolutely a chance that the Penguins would consider Boudreau if that was an option for them at the time.
Nick Bermel: Why do the Penguins always lose to the Flyers? Are the Flyers just the superior team?
Brad Franjione: Well, let’s start off by saying that the Flyers have not won a Stanley Cup since 1975. The Penguins have 3 Stanley Cups since then. Oh, and were the Flyers in the playoffs last year?
As I recall, they were not…
That being said, you do bring up a good point. I want to say it’s been 8 games straight that the Flyers have beat the Penguins in head to head match-ups.
I think that the rivalry between the Penguins and Flyers adds some crazy intensity to every game, and I think the Flyers know how to take advantage of that. The Flyers play in a way that really gets into the heads of the Penguins’ players, and the Penguins play into that style that the Flyers play. Props to the Flyers for that. In addition, the Flyers have some solid offensive threats up front in Giroux, Voracek, Simmonds, and others.
The Flyers have been the superior team in head-to-head matchups against the Penguins in recent years, but they are by no means the superior team in general.
Raafay Rishi: Which NHL defenseman do you think the Penguins will trade for and who will the Penguins give up in the trade?
Brad Franjione: To be quite honest, Raafay, right now the defense is not the problem. The offense is.
But as I said in one of my previous articles, the defense is going to decline slightly as the season goes on. The Penguins right now are stacked offensively and need help on defense…at least on paper.
Who do I think they should go after? Dustin Byfuglien.
The Penguins do not have many physical players, and Byfuglien answers that concern. He hits people HARD. He also has a bomb of a shot, and is a great power play guy, which the Penguins really need right now.
So, if the Penguins were to pursue Byfuglien, who do they give up?
Right now, the centerpiece of that trade for me is David Perron. He has offensive skill and can be a decent player, but he just does not seem to fit anywhere into the Penguins lineup right now. The Penguins would have to throw in something else besides Perron, but I think he would be the centerpiece.
Some other pieces that the Penguins would consider using along with Perron could be players such as Kunitz, Scuderi, or even young defenseman Derrick Pouliot.
I’m not sure if the Penguins will pursue Byfuglien, but I do not have a problem with taking advantage of the offensive surplus and helping firm up the defensive corps, especially considering that the Penguins only have two top pair defensemen and a bunch of other bottom pair guys.
Now that I think about it, I’d buy a Byfuglien shirt.
Casey Chafin: Let’s jump to the major conclusion that Johnston is out. What do you look for in a replacement, style wise? And what immediate changes should the new guy implement?
Brad Franjione: If you do not know, Johnston’s style has a very “defense first” mentality. The offense is created through defense and the defense move up into the play to help create offense.
So Rob Scuderi is supposed to provide offense for this team? Yeah… Okay…
The coach of the Penguins needs to be a guy who coaches in an offensive-minded style. The Penguins are built upon their star players’ success. They have star power up front, and they are clearly one of the best offensive teams in the NHL, at least on paper.
The Penguins should be winning 6-3 type of hockey games, not 2-1 hockey games. The new coach needs to be one that puts the emphasis on offense, not defense (although defense is obviously still important).
In regards to the second part of your question, I think the biggest immediate change (besides the overall strategy) is the power play. The power play is just not working, but it needs to be. The players are too good for it not to work.
In the last 3 years of Bylsma’s stint with the Penguins, the Penguins had power plays clicking at 19.7%, 24.7%, and 23.4% which ranked them 5th, 2nd, and 1st in the NHL respectively. So clearly Crosby, Malkin, Letang and co. can be successful. Obviously the power play can work, but it obviously hasn’t under Johnston and Tocchet.
The Penguins finished with a power play percentage of 19.3% last year, which is not too bad at all. That being said, the power play was clicking at about 40% for the first 20 or so games. This means in the last 60 or so games, the power play was not working so well.
This year, the Penguins power play is only clicking at a 7.1%, which is 29th in the NHL.
This needs to be fixed, and it needs to be a priority for the head coach that takes over Johnston, because I do not think he will be here much longer.
Doug Godwin: What would you attribute Sid’s lack of production to over the last 2 years? Declining skills? Coaching? NHL changing?
Brad Franjione: Well, let me start with this: last year, scoring in the entire NHL was down. The Art Ross winner Jamie Benn had only 86 points. Crosby finished with 83 points, and finished first in the NHL in points per game.
The NHL is general is changing. Goalies are getting bigger, the pads are getting bigger, and goals are harder to come by. It showed last year.
Although Crosby was first in the NHL in points per game, he really hasn’t looked like “vintage Crosby” over last season and this season. Especially this season.
If you recall, Crosby had one great game against the Panthers this year where he registered a career high 9 shots on goal and had 3 points in that game. He had some hop to his step and played an absolutely terrific game. Past that, he has been invisible.
I think part of his problem right now is coaching. Johnston has been questionable to say the least, and considering he had no NHL coaching experience before taking over the Penguins, I’m not sure how much respect and trust Crosby has in this guy.
His main problem? He needs to shoot.
Hopefully this problem is partially solved through reuniting him and Hornqvist, but regardless, Sid needs to shoot. He showed us all that when he shoots the puck, good things happen. When you’re as good of a player as Sidney Crosby, you’ll score goals and put up points when you shoot as much as he did against the Panthers.
Case and point: Alex Ovechkin. The guy has a tremendous shot, and shoots the puck like crazy. He gets rewarded by collecting Rocket Richard trophies like it’s his job.
Remember that Crosby was a Rocket Richard winner himself. He has the ability to do it, but now that he isn’t the only star player on the team, he feels the need to pass the puck. A LOT. Like, way too much.
Yeah, Crosby is not as young as he once was, but he hasn’t lost much skill at all. I do not think this is an issue at all. He just needs to play with confidence and be a little more selfish with the puck.
You want to see Crosby’s production trend in the upwards direction? Tell him to shoot.
Grant Franjione: Two questions for you: how do you explain the Penguins complete inability to bounce back from even 1 goal deficits when trailing after 2 periods of play? Also, when I watch the Penguins, it just seems like chances to score in today’s NHL are just super tough to come by, but yet I see less offensively talented teams have occasional outbursts of 4, 5, or even 6 goals in a game. What are those teams doing that the Penguins aren’t? Are they just luckier?
Brad Franjione: Well, let’s take this one question at a time.
So, from what I could remember, the Penguins were actually a pretty good comeback team when playing under Dan Bylsma. They have been the exact opposite under Johnston. Although some of the players change every year, the Penguins have had the same core players throughout this span. So, is their inability to come back simply based on the head coach?
Well, the problem is that I FEEL like the Penguins were a good comeback team under Bylsma. But I wanted to convince you AND myself that the Penguins were a much better comeback team under Bylsma than they are under Johnston. So I decided to do some research and calculations.
From the beginning of the 2009-2010 season to the end of the 2013-2014 season, which is the time frame where Bylsma was the head coach (excluding his stint with Pens in 2009 when they won the Cup) the Penguins won 21.19% of their games when trailing going into the 3rd, which is good enough for 2nd in the NHL during that span.
Yeah, the 2nd best winning percentage when trailing going into the third period!
The Penguins are currently 0-21-5 in that category under Johnston. Yikes.
Last year, the Penguins scored only 12 goals in 23 opportunities when they entered the 3rd period trailing. In this situation, the Penguins were only scoring .53 goals per period, while they averaged .89 goals per period throughout the season.
This year, the Penguins are 0-3 in this situation, and have yet to score a goal when going into the 3rd down by at least a goal.
Oh, and I’m not done yet…
The Penguins, under their 5 full seasons under Bylsma, won 45.35% of their games when they allowed the first goal of the game. Their NHL rank in this category in this 5 year span? 1st. You heard me, 1st. The best team in the NHL at winning games when allowing the first goal.
Under Johnston, the Penguins have only won 26.32% of these games.
Convinced yet? If not, I have one more stat for you.
Under Johnston, it seems as though the Penguins have at least been pretty good at holding a lead when they get it. They are 4-0 this season when scoring the first goal, and have not been trailing in any of these 4 games.
So, under Johnston, the Penguins have won 69.82% of their games when scoring the first goal. Under Bylsma? The Penguins won 74.47% of their games when scoring the first goal.
Why did they get rid of Bylsma again?
To answer the second part of your question, let me start with this. The Penguins shooting percentage this year is 5%, which is 29th in the NHL. Last year, the Penguins had a shooting percentage of 8.39%, which is less than the shooting percentage of any Penguins team under Dan Bylsma.
So, why are the Penguins not scoring a ton of goals with their offense? Well, they aren’t scoring on many of their shots.
So, why aren’t they scoring on many of their shots?
Johnston’s strategy entails shot volume, which does seem pretty logical right? The more pucks you throw on net, the more pucks that are going to go in. At least, it seems that way…
To Johnston’s credit, the Penguins finished 4th in the NHL in shots per game last year, and currently sit in 4th place in the NHL this year in shots on goal per game. But is shot volume really the answer?
Here is my thought: when a coach preaches about shot volume, as a player, you are going to focus on shooting the puck (unless your name is Sidney Crosby, then you’re never going to shoot the puck). However, I think this gives the players a mentality of “let’s make sure we get shots on goal.” In other words, they’re shooting to shoot.
They’re not shooting to score.
I think this is the underlying difference. Shot volume is important, but the some of those shots need to come on quality chances, and the players have to shoot to score, not just to shoot.
That concludes this week’s Q and A! I’ll be doing the same thing next Tuesday! As always, thank you again to everyone who keeps up with me, and a special thanks to those who participated in my first Q and A session.
Remember to follow me on Twitter @FranjiPensPress and like me on Facebook at Franjione Pens Press.
My next article will be up late on Wednesday night after the Penguins face off against the Capitals on rivalry night.